It's always hard to tell without hearing intonation whether questions like this are asked in good faith out of genuine curiosity, or as a bid to steer the conversation towards semantics and nits.

Whether one can list the specific laws broken by Theranos in their specific jurisdiction is one question, whether the fraudulent nature of the company passes the bullshit test is another.

Seeing as people I know who don't even know or care much about Silicon Valley talk about Elizabeth Holmes like she's the next Jeff Skilling (something about Houston I guess), it seems, at the minimum, highly likely, given lawsuits, severed ties, total collapse, etc. that she trafficked in fraud. You're welcome to push PR on me, but you're fighting common sense, for better or worse.

She made totally false claims about her technology to investors; claiming they were performing tests with their own tech when they were using outside tech. That seems like fraud to me?

The reality is she's too well connected and wealthy to see any jail time, though.

18 USC 1343, 18 USC 1001, and/or 15 USC 78j(b)?

I don't know anything about the investments, but I'm guessing a variety around providing human diagnostic testing that will be the basis for medical decisions.