Changing locations is barely given a blurb in the article and I don't see how it would help that much apart from maybe motivation-related reasons (similar to having a separate room in your home for your home office). Is there a study on location changing? I'd bet the location trick's effects are dominated by the fact that spaced repetition is at play, which also gets mentioned in the article. Is there a study that tries to detect a difference between spaced repetition in the same location and spaced repetition in other locations? If there were a difference, then maybe it could work on the idea that you're creating a subconscious association with the place you're studying in and the thing you're learning, and by recalling and learning it in another location you're adding another association and strengthening the common paths. But I have to wonder if explicitly constructing a memory palace to create such associations between facts and things/places is a far superior strategy and again would dominate any effect of different location.
ICQ number and quake 3 CD key stand out to me as oddly specific things that have persisted for over 2 decades in my memory now. What's odd is how much that skews my judgement of sunk costs - The fact that I know those things occasionally prompts me to reinstall each, even though there is no point.
>it wouldn't surprise me if I could recall others with more careful thinking or perhaps some nostalgic browsing of old photos.
This can also happen accidentally - A forgotten smell or sound brings back associated memories that were otherwise inaccessible to you.
I think so, see state dependent memory. Mood and intoxication can play a role here as well. [1]
"recalling and learning it in another location you're adding another association and strengthening the common paths"
I think so, see aaachilless's sibling comment [2] about the pattern becoming generic.