> it's no different than forcing others to smoke by the means of social pressure
Yeah... no different, except one of them causes cancer but sure, no different.
> it's no different than forcing others to smoke by the means of social pressure
Yeah... no different, except one of them causes cancer but sure, no different.
Email is not a platform, I think you are confusing it with gmail.
> You can't walk outside the bar then complain that none of your friends want to stand in the window and relay everything happening to you or get mad they might be talking about you when you can just walk right back in.
This analogy doesn't stand because such pictures that I were talking about are more often than not are taken in the bar settings or other festivities. Obviously if I were walking outside I couldn't be on the picture could I. And it's not all of my friends that's the point, being forced to smoke even passively harms your health, being forced to be on facebook harms your privacy - that was my point.
> Yeah... no different, except one of them causes cancer but sure, no different.
And Facebook causes harm to people in other ways. It's an overly dramatic way of making the point, but the point is that people using Facebook doesn't just affect them -- it affects anyone in their social circle.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/may/19/popular-soci...
I see Facebook as a type of cancer so...