(2015)?
> If you know of any other good ones (including a sample break), then please provide the link
Two months after that article was published:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/18/9
> But I listened carefully, because I suspected an easy target that I wanted to have a go at.
This was my easy target.
I find it quite fascinating how people who produce snake-oil crypto tend to not accept any mention of possible faults in their algorithms, in comparison to professional cryptographers who welcome public cryptanalysis.