About the open office plan, I don't think that's the case at all. I don't know if we know enough about it to say, but I think enough is known to say it has a prototypical open office floor plan. Maybe if one were to be overly technical and argue that it is technically "open" then I would have no choice but to agree, however that's not really a common sense way of looking at things. It looks like the pods resemble something more akin to how whales organize. Plus I can't believe they'd spend so much time designing the hardware without giving the software some thought, if my analogy makes sense.
Indeed, I am currently looking out my window at several Amazon office towers that most employees didn't drive to.
The problem is we current have three choices:
- Cars
- "Company Store"-style housing (e.g. get fired, get made homeless)
- Good public transport.
The third option is obviously the best but it is outside of any single company's control. To get good quality public transport the entire city (or cities) need to be onboard, invest sometimes billions of dollars, and likely run it at a near loss (since most public transport systems lose money).
If someone knows of an alternative not listed above, I'd like to read about it. And, no, automated vehicles aren't an alternative because they don't actually exist in production yet.
The other thing they can do is what Google does: buy their own buses and bus in some of the employees from key locations. It's not exactly "public transport", but it's pretty close, and doesn't make anyone homeless if they lose their job there, and it wouldn't cost the company much, while it'd save a lot of cars from pouring emissions into the air every day.
They do that already. I work down the street from the current Apple headquarters and the sheer amount of Apple buses during commute hours is insane. They must come every few minutes from 8-10a and 4-7p or so, because its rare for me to see less than 2 or 3 within a couple blocks of HQ during those hours.
people would be probably praising it even if it would be just another boring skyscraper just because it's Apple
well i have news for you, just because it's Apple HQ it doesn't make it really interesting or nice building from architectural standpoint
Here we have a company that goes way out of their way to build a ridiculously cool campus for their employees and the top comment is talking about how it's no different from what we see in Office Space. Jesus christ are you all really that jaded?
Being "no different" is not the same as "still the same in certain respects"
I don't think this building is "ridiculously cool."
"Out of their way" ? Are you suggesting altruism or generosity?
Those single person pod/offices are huge productivity benefits that most tech companies simply won't invest in.
Citation needed.
"Workplace Quality and Product Quality - Companies that provide small and noisy workplaces explain away complaints as workers campaigning for the added status of bigger, more private space. To determine whether noise level had any correlation to work, we divided our sample into those who found the workplace acceptably quiet and those who didn't. Then, looking at workers within each group who completed the entire exercise without a single defect: > Workers who reported that their workplace was acceptably quiet before the exercise were 1/3 more likely to deliver zero-defect work. As the noise level gets worse, this trend gets stronger:
Zero-defect workers: => 66% reported noise level OK 1-or-more-defect workers: => 8% reported noise level OK A Discovery of Nobel Prize Significance - On February 3, 1984, in a study of 32,346 companies worldwide, the authors confirmed a virtually perfect inverse relationship between people density and dedicated floor space per person. If you're having trouble seeing why this matters, you're not thinking about noise. Noise is directly proportional to density, so halving the allotment of space per person can be expected to double the noise. Even if you managed to prove conclusively that a programmer could work in 30 sq. ft. without being hopelessly space-bound, you still wouldn't be able to conclude that 30 sq. ft. is adequate space. The noise in a 30 sq. ft matrix is more than triple the noise in a 100 sq. ft. matrix, which could make the difference between a plague of product defects and none at all."
So everyone should just put on headphones, right? Peopleware says no.
"experiment done at Cornell -- they gave two groups a complicated task involving a long string of calculations. One group listened to music while performing the task, and one group had silence.
What they didn't tell either group is that the complicated string of calculations always returned the original number.
It turned out that not everyone figured this out, but of the people who did, a large majority came from the group that did not listen to music.
The theory apparently being is that listening to music is somehow engaging the part of the brain involved in creative thought, keeping it "busy" enough not to be able to look at the big picture of the task being performed."
All developers should consider their surroundings and how they affect their thought process. I actually stopped listening to popular music while developing, after I read this and some other studies about it's effect at keeping part of your brain (the language processing parts) occupied. I still listen to music part time, and try to listen to instrumentals only.