If they threaten to seize my phone, I'll let them. I have plenty of spares and can afford a new one if it comes down to it.
Of course, many people don't have the means to make this a practical approach.
If they threaten to seize my phone, I'll let them. I have plenty of spares and can afford a new one if it comes down to it.
Of course, many people don't have the means to make this a practical approach.
True for police, but less clear for border crossings.
http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/02/16/border-agent-unloc...
> They don't even need a warrant. It's clear the government does not need a warrant to search the phone based on a constitutional law, a set of cases called the Border Search Exceptions.
For fingerprint authentication, I believe it's been established that they can hold you until you cooperate.
For passwords, they can't. "The second question is, can they detain you until you hand over your passcode? They probably have some power to detain you for a little bit — maybe for an hour or two — not forever. They can't hold at the border and say, ‘Alright, you're living here until you hand over your passcode.’"
Then the question is whether they can follow up with some sort of punishment after the fact if you continue to refuse. According to that article, it hasn't been established yet, but I'm confident that it would come out in my favor, and furthermore that they would think similarly and not even try it.
If they confiscate your device I'm not sure how long they can keep it off the top of my head, but I would operate under the assumption that you're not getting it back. There are legal remedies for this sort of warrantless seizure, but I'm guessing that there's a mechanism through which they could charge the phone itself with a crime in order to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, a'la asset forfeiture.