> Religion isn't math; it's subjective.
No I'm sorry. It is objectively delusional.
No I'm sorry. It is objectively delusional.
That said: we have science now for the first bit, which is much more effective at that job minus the simplicity. What do we have to replace the second part?
I should probably expand on that somewhat tongue in cheek answer. It's a pretty cynical response, but there's truth in it. Following and/or playing sports provides people with a tribe and a set of shared values and camaraderie. Much like religion, I've never felt the need for this, but there's certainly a very large set of people who do.