If you have a problem with the equation of anti-Tibet political intervention by China and anti-Palestine intervention by Israel then state your case.
As much as Israel has colonized parts of Palestine by way of settlements, its nothing like the Chinese annexation and colonization of Tibet.
In reality, both of these are clear examples of how the victor gets to write the history books. By getting rid of the conversations, this is unequivocally censorship.
And the comparison is pretty obvious, because I can't think of any other countries that are doing something similar, at least on a noticeable scale (i.e. actually getting results they want).
I don't think I'd have a problem with people advocating for settlements if they acknowledged they were colonizing native people in order to eradicate their culture.
At least be honest about it. People act like Israel is some sort of liberal state.