This might be the first time anyone has accused me of modesty.
You say that lawsuits are merely part of "a well-scripted conflict narrative between corporate entities".
Here in Australia our Federal Court recently hit Chevron for $300 million in a tax case that some say will have implications worldwide for corporate tax structures.
Couldn't a new model of law based on that kind of questioning of corporations and corporate governance regulate the Valley (and Wall Street) effectively?
If not what are the holes in such a claim?