It was mildly entertaining to read this line in that wiki page:
> Industry pundit Robert X. Cringely believed a breakup was not possible, and that "now the only way Microsoft can die is by suicide."
Ironically as far as browsers are concerned IE6-~IE9 was a fair attempt at suicide.
And it will be a "great success" with near 100% conversion rate because the upgrade will be forced on everyone.
No, they won't. There's 3 different versions of Windows 10 now: Home, S, and Pro (and Enterprise for big corps). People who don't like the limitations of S are free to buy one of the other two versions, and they'll probably even an easy way to "upgrade" to Pro for $$$. Over in Europe, if that's not good enough, they'll just eliminate S and stick with the other two versions, and let only Americans get suckered by the S version.
As in, "suckered into getting a version of Windows 10 Pro for $50"?
The upgrade option is already there in 10S, and it only takes a couple of seconds to authorize it.
Do iOS or ChromeOS even support installing a different browser without jailbreaking? How does a new OS with 0% share fall afoul of anti-trust laws?
Is Microsoft prohibited forever from making something like iOS or ChromeOS while their competitors do whatever lockdown they want with their platforms?
What's IE's and Bing's marketshare anyway? Is it 98% like Windows was in that case you're referring to?
I can't speak for Chrome OS, but yes, you can install other browsers on iOS (Chrome, for example). It's required to use WebKit behind the scenes, but it's still the Chrome browser experience.
I think that these days, people are more worried about google using its monopoly for anti-competitive practice than they are worried about Microsoft. I know I'm more worried about google in this regard.
I still hope they're going to get slapped for this though, because it quite clearly is anti-competitive behaviour.