I made it as an experiment, results vary and can be awfully wrong but it's funny to see the confusions the neural network can make. Funny until somebody eat a deadly mushroom because of me, I guess. I already put plenty of warnings, so fingers crossed, but it's hard to be sure it won't be misused.
It's a given all guides have false information, it then begs the question are guides worse than no guides? I think this can be easily answered more information is better.
You can give people information but you can't understand it for them.
kudos for making the app :)
What do you think your app would identify this as? Carpet mushroom? http://imgur.com/a/Rqc64
I volunteered at Audubon for a decade. I've got all the books, charts. I hike and camp. I can't identify rocks, birds, fish, trees, clouds, etc to save my life.
Square peg, round hole.
What I'm realizing is that it takes active participation and interest in indentifying things to really learn their names and their histories, not just a passing interest.
The Cornell Lab of Ornithology has a site [1] and an app that is amazing for identifying birds. My favorite feature is how it also lists birds that are similar, which makes it a lot easier to find the specific bird you're looking for. I then compare visual information with the auditory information of the birds calls to make a concrete identification.
I am not sure I even know enough to ask the right questions on this. But what tools, languages, computing resources, etc do you use?