> Because in recent years, it's become fashionable to hate business
Hmmmm, funny that, I can't imagine it has anything to do with people being fed up with being ruthlessly and endlessly fucked by businesses for so much as a minor gain on their bottom line.
Being in favour of regulation != Implying that all regulation is good and perfect. Regulation can be hard to get right, but it's there to protect the interests of the public (which should necessarily override any corporate interest).
Case in point: we now need net neutrality regulation, to ensure that we preserve (ironically) some of the very things that make the internet so great: low barrier to entry, fair and equal access etc etc.
Want to know what happens when uber squeezes it's competition out and then runs out of VC money? They'll shamelessly extort the money out of the consumer. So yeah, I'm pretty happy to watch them burn.
> creeping distaste for anyone who would seriously consider startups' interests over the interests of the individual.
But why are they so deserving? What makes a startup special that they would be preferenced above people and communities?
> /r/LateStageCapitalism (a subreddit whose explicit purpose is to hate rich people the same way some people hate minorities)
If by "hating rich people" you mean "taking issue with rampant exploitation of people and resources by corporations", then yeah, is say they have some pretty legitimate complaints.
> Some technology would not happen at all without startups, such as airbnb
Right, because only startup culture would have come up with the revolutionary idea of a bedsit. Truly an idea we've never before had in history.