Now you want to burn down the agency because you had two SBIR proposals rejected, which is statistically to be expected for good proposals and certainly for proposals which you describe as "not feasible" and "not suitable for mass production" (yes, I realize the second description was applied by the reviewer not by you, but that response indicates you failed to adequately make the business case for your proposal which is essential to success in every SBIR application process).
Getting funding for ideas is hard. It always has been and always will be because there are more good ideas than dollars. Most proposals, including most good proposals, will never get funded. This isn't a conspiracy. It's a fact.
Burning down our scientific infrastructure and slashing its funding because it's currently not funded at a level that allows it to do the things you want it to do is a strange response at best.