Hacker News Reader

> they have avoided the most scummy thing they could do to become a monopoly: driver lock-in, making their drivers commit to only drive for them and not for Lyft.

Arguably the only reason why is because it would mean they'd have to classify the drivers as employees rather than contractors.

Look up "uber driver incentives". They are clearly working on it, just without going all "second commandment" to protect their "not an employer" status.

> Uber isn't a monopoly.

Like every startup (and most companies), it aims to be; a moat is pricing power is an absence of substitute is monopoly.

Sure, they want to be a monopoly. But they're not.

Seriously, how do they get lock-in of riders or drivers? Installing a second app is a really really low bar. You can't do predatory pricing forever.

They don't have to. Drivers are dime a dozen for them.