It's possible she would have got the job if she were a man, I don't know. But what I am fairly sure of is that if she were a man then I wouldn't be hearing about it.
It's possible she would have got the job if she were a man, I don't know. But what I am fairly sure of is that if she were a man then I wouldn't be hearing about it.
Secondly, in a field with so many incredibly talented and well recommended individuals, hiring is hard and there's no way to objectively determine who is the best. So we try hard to filter down candidates, and in the end pick someone knowing that at the very least we've chosen someone utterly amazing.
Read her bio.
She earned it.
Actually, academics have a strong track record of publishing, teacher reviews, management etc.
Arguably, it's harder to tell 'who should get the job' in a field of so many talented people.
I wouldn't chalk this one up to affirmative action - this is just someone who got the job.
I feel bad. But what's the alternative: Bullshit & say I'm sure her being a woman has nothing to do with the promotion? I just can't say that with any certainty.
I guess affirmative action is a double-edged sword.
Biases exist. Meritocracy is an illusion. Deal with it.
All it mandates is that if on paper two candidates are equal scores, your process should pick the female/minority candidate. Historically, if you left it up to people in the organisation they'd go with their "gut" feelings and pick whomever was of a similar background to them.
If two candidates aren't equal, you always pick the better candidate.
Please, enlighten me?
Yes. I try and have a coherent worldview. And I don't think discrimination is useful for productivity.
My point is discrimination exists no matter what. So try not to let it bother you.
She's qualified.