But how is it fair to start punishing the company overall with consumer activism just because there are allegations of misconduct?
How is it fair to always assume the best? This is not the first story of Uber's misdeeds.
How is it fair to always assume the best? This is not the first story of Uber's misdeeds.
In your world, it could be because they are an evil monster, and they bought off the cops and the plaintiff.
In my world, it is possible that none of them were instances of breaking the law and worth going after.
PS: read up on confirmation bias.