Hacker News Reader

Comment by qznc | Hacker News Reader

There is more to it.

For example, note that the numerals map to their direct binary notation plus a 011 in front. 0 => ...0000, 1 => ...0001, 2 => ...0010, etc.

Now I wonder, why don't they start in the zero row? In other words, why is 0 = 0110000, instead of 0100000?

Why are the parens not in the same row as braces and brackets?

Why isn't "&" (ligature of "et") not in the same row as "e"? "$" ("dollar") is in the same row as "d".

View on HN

The 1963 standard⁰ answers your questions. (Probably the final 1967 version does too, but it's not online anywhere.)

In this instance the more common 8-column presentation actually better reflects the design. It's important that the low 4 bits of '0' are 0. The 0x2X column and 0x3X column are related by shift (on some devices²).

⁰ http://worldpowersystems.com/archives/codes/X3.4-1963/index....

¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary-coded_decimal

² https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit-paired_keyboard

> Probably the final 1967 version does too, but it's not online anywhere.

Is this it?

http://worldpowersystems.com/archives/codes/Revised-ASCII/in...

Unfortunately that's just an article on the changes in the new version.

You have a typo in the code for zero, it doesn't end with 1. The reason 0 can't be 0100000 is that's the start of the printable characters and an established standard/requirement was that space collate below all other printable characters. So you have to start with space, you can't put 0 there.

> Why isn't "&" (ligature of "et") not in the same row as "e"? "$" ("dollar") is in the same row as "d".

It matches old mechanical typewriters. I have one with the shift-characters over the numbers being exactly what was 16 characters (one bit flip) away in the table.

And why isn't the octothorpe in the same row as "o"?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com