P.S.:
Looking at landing page: "Internet for people, not profit."
Images: close-ups of Africans, Asians, Hispanic, women. What about white males?
All: please don't feed such topics. If this is the kind of thing you want to engage in, HN is not the corner of the internet you're looking for.
For the record I didn't see any Polynesian, Micronesian, Melanesian, or Jewish people. I also didn't see any Black Men, Asian Women, Transgender, etc.
I saw a White woman and a White man with a VR head set though.
I would hardly call it a backlash or even outrage. The observation being made is that they're specifically excluding a prominent demographic in their attempts at appearing inclusive or cross cultural.
The message being sent isn't "we're all equal", it's "we don't need/want you."
Of course they want and need you. Assuming you're white, male, middle class, a resident of the United States, and work in the tech industry - you probably make up the majority of Mozillas workforce and are one of the most privileged people on the planet.
As I said, there was also a white male in the pictures.
Why wouldn't it in the United States?
>and are one of the most privileged people on the planet
This sort of language rubs me the wrong way; it sort of invalidates the hard work of my ancestors who wanted to create a better life for their descendants.
I realise that this will probably be taken as a troll like statement, but that's not my intention. In all earnestness we do need to take a hard look at ourselves and how we've behaved as a society, you can't own your ancestors hard work without also owning what they did to indigenous and minority people.
And also what gives us the right to have all of these advantageous and benefits purely by an accident of birth?
White people were slaves. (The word slave derives from "Slav".) Africans sold off their own to the slave trade for profit. Whites were the only ones to die for the freedom of another race. There is more slavery occurring today in non-white countries than ever occurred in white countries. You get the point--it's not so black and white.
Europe had practically no slaves, but that didn't stop Europeans from creating societies with the best quality of life.
>And also what gives us the right to have all of these advantageous and benefits purely by an accident of birth?
Humanity should only move as fast as the slowest person? Are you questioning the inherent genetic motivation for parents to care more about their offspring and community than someone on the other side of the world? It's wrong for a child to inherit what his ancestors built but right for someone on the other side of the world to inherit what someone else's ancestors built?
You should take a look at the Waitangi tribunal in New Zealand which redresses historical injustices to the Maori, it's not perfect but is a good illustration on a society owning up to its mistakes and trying to fix them and returns billions of dollars worth of assets to Iwi.
The other thing that you seem to forget is that Mozilla is a global company, it has a bigger market presence in countries outside of the US and so it needs to tailor its marketing for a world audience. Less than 10% of the worlds population is of European descent, therefore you'd say that Europeans are over represented in the marketing.
Yes, but we can allow each office to reflect the local population and not the global population.
>Less than 10% of the worlds population is of European descent, therefore you'd say that Europeans are over represented in the marketing.
This is completely valid since Mozilla wants to reach a global audience.
Since white people are a slim minority in the world, doesn't it seem wrong to encourage population displacement by people with a population privilege? Why are white countries targeted for not being "diverse" enough?
The reason you're facing a backlash, and the inherit problem with your position is that you're stereotyping every Caucasian as a being born with a silver spoon in their mouth and completely dismissing any and all hardships they've faced. The entire basis for this entitlement you feel is built around the premise that we're all privileged and could stand to be brought down a couple pegs.
You pretend that there isn't a lower class or that those in the lower class are still privileged by comparison because to admit otherwise would question your sense of entitlement.
White privileged is our Original Sin I guess then?
You're missing valuable context in that comment, you can't own the hard work of your ancestors without owning their atrocities either, it might not have been your direct ancestors but it is the history of your society. You either forget that history or own all of it.
"Dominant"? No, not at all. Left alone in our out countries without people who enjoy population privilege displacing us? Yes.
If you have a problem with this ask your self why. If whites are horrible oppressors then surely they should be left alone so that they cannot oppress others? If whites are so terrible why do others crawl their way into white countries? If we are truly all equal then surely non-white countries won't be left behind, right?
People don't choose how, when, or where they are born. They come into the world a blank slate and are shaped by those before them. They little choice in the matter.
You can't forgive or dismiss the errs of one culture while holding another completely accountable for things that came before them.
You can't dismiss their experience as invalid or insignificant because you feel that someone else is more important.
That's the same type of reasoning and ignorance that led to the situation we're in.
I'm not dismissing anything, I'm saying we have the opportunity to break the cycle of inequality and anyone fighting that is not just ignorant but also deeply selfish.
Did you also miss the part where he said that his race deserved to be the prominent race because it is genetically superior? Is it okay to express feelings like that?
I feel sick.
Is there anyone on earth that doesn't have ancestors that committed atrocities? Why is it only white people that have to answer for these atrocities?
I think you'll find that the Japanese payed reparation after WW2.
You shouldn't think of things in terms of white and not white, that is just insane. In general civilised countries pay for their mistakes.
In New Zealand we have a tribunal who's goal is to pay for any atrocities and acts of theft perpetrated by the British Empire, a completely different country to modern day NZ, yet we as a society do it because it's the right thing to do.
>I think you'll find that the Japanese payed reparation after WW2.
I think you'll find Japan doesn't even recognize many atrocities it committed in WW2.
Japan paid reparation after WW2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_reparations#World_War_II_J...
So don't take it so personally. It's not about you but about the society we all want to build together.
(The distinction between benefiting and causing is lost on some of the diversity advocates, too, unfortunately.)