This isn't Hacker News, or even news. It's just a reblog of somebody's opinion about something that is already overly discussed. Their opinion is irrelevant. It's just another opinion. It's no different than if any one of us made a silly blog post about how we did or didn't return some product that we did or didn't like.
It's just a waste.
It also means that developers will start using a Linux based OS, which is pleasing to me.
1. Every time someone brings this up other people say "It's fine." and it really isn't fine.
2. We want Apple to hear that their core customers are unhappy and they should rethink the current course for their hardware.
I love Apple computers but they currently don't provide a serious upgrade option for my 2012 15" rMBP. The 2016 15" is a joke by comparison.
I honestly don't think HN posters (nor bloggers) are anywhere near Apple's "core customers" - that's the millions of people who just want something workable from a shop they trust, not a few thousand (being optimistic) forum posters and bloggers.
e.g. After 5 days, it was already crushing the competition and approaching 18 months of Macbook 2015 sales.
https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-macbook-pro-sales-already...
"Indexed revenue" instead of number of units sold? "n=16,754 online shoppers" but the article says "panel of 4.4 million online shoppers"?
But do you know what those people base their purchasing decisions on? The recommendations of the developers and engineers they know who do care about those specs.
I can't tell you how many people have moved over to Apple computers on my recommendations over the years. It's a lot. Right now I have a hard time recommending the 2016 models. If people can get a refurbished 2015 on the cheap I honestly think it's a better choice.
> After 5 days, it was already crushing the competition and approaching 18 months of Macbook 2015 sales.
This statistic is very popular but it's also extremely misleading. Everybody knew the lineup was due for a refresh so 2015 sales were lagging because of that, the higher numbers represent a dam of pent up purchases waiting for upgrades bursting. It's like pointing out that the number of people complaining about the 2016 models is way higher than the people complaining about the 2015 models. Of course it is. That doesn't tell the whole story and is somewhat misleading on its own.
My point is just because initial sales of the 2016 models is high, doesn't mean that it will stay that way. Once they get into people's hands and people find out "Oh the battery life is terrible and I really don't like the TouchBar." those sales may plummet (if that indeed is people's reaction.)
Apple needs to really re-examine. The current 13" and 15" MBP models should be the base "MacBook" models, and they should come out with a serious pro machine and label it as such (which restores MagSafe and has higher battery life.) The TouchBar should just be thrown off a bridge. It's a terrible gimmicky attempt at stuffing a touch screen onto a laptop.
None of the non-technical people I know (and I'll admit that's a small number) who buy Apple kit do not take recommendations from developers and engineers because they're non-technical people - they don't read HN or tech blogs. They look at things like Which? reviews or BBC think pieces or that glossy insert that comes with the Sunday paper.
Or they go into an Apple store where they can touch the machines, use them for browsing the web, get answers to their questions (ok, bit slow at peak times) vs something like a PC World where you can't use the machine or they don't have that particular model in stock despite it being on display or there's no-one around to answer your question or you can't tell which particular constellation of stickers on the laptop means it'll work for you or ...
> Apple needs to [...]
People have been saying this since 2005. They're still here, printing money. shrug
Also don't forget returns. Which is what I'm going to do with my top spec MBP 15". Oh well.
However, this is the first time I've been aware that battery life is genuinely crippled. My perception since just after launch was "occasional problem due to Safari bug".
On the battery issues: the battery in the new MBP is (I think) up to 30% smaller compared to the previous generation. To balance that, Apple is using displays that consume less power. The problem there is that the CPU still consumes the same amount of power under load. I think most devs have experienced the rapid battery drain that comes from running CPU intensive tasks. Given all of this, the results of his tests don't really surprise me.
[EDIT] not that it makes a difference to their revenue immediately, but I wouldn't take touchbar mac purchases as expressions of love of/interest in the touchbar.
Also, for those making a $2k+ purchasing decision, it pays to do a little research as to what other people who work in similar situations think about the different options.
I read a lot of reviews for MacBooks, Lenovo T4xx series, Dell XPS models, etc. Just like with any other topic, the color of varied opinions helps one arrive at a better understanding.
---
Since my comment is abrasive -- much more so than normal for me here on HN -- I figured it was worth it for me to put some more effort into this and provide some evidence. I easily came up with the following list of topics here from the last month:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13315262
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13244357
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13251401
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13253390
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13157832
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13172903
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13214754
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13164534
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13220623
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13217008
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13337727 (note that, while the headline is a bit general, much of the discussion is related to the new MBP)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13169060
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13185428
I just stopped after this point. There were more.
Imagine being on a Muscle Car Enthusiast forum, and Ford released a V8 Mustang that had less horsepower than it's predecessor, and worse handling, but just came with minor stylistic upgrades. The same thing would be happening.
Thankfully there is a lot of positivity, though you have to look harder for it.
For the rest of us, it is an equipment choice that might have to make at some point, and the we'll go back to work on our code ;).