But it doesn't make sense, why try and reduce the revenue of websites further than the personal non contribution of using an adblocker (which improves personal experience)
Do people really think websites will be able to run off donations, are people that naive?
From the AdNauseam website:
> AdNauseam serves as a means of amplifying users' discontent with advertising networks that disregard privacy and facilitate bulk surveillance agendas.
> In light of the industry's failure to self-regulate or otherwise address the excesses of network tracking, AdNauseam allows individual users to take matters into their own hands, fighting back against unilateral surveillance.
AdNauseam's developers want to break the current Big data/surveillance-based advertising model. That is not the only possible model for advertising. Something like The Deck model, where there's no tracking or flashing jumping Punch the Monkey, just a static image link to the advertiser landing page, is a possibility.
Currently I believe that the people who don't mind dealing with ads are getting a better service, than the people paying for subscriptions directly.
I can't imagine it being that much of a problem in days of password managers and cookies...
"Currently I believe that the people who don't mind dealing with ads are getting a better service, than the people paying for subscriptions directly."
I subscribe to a bunch of newspapers (and I'm a 20-something tech guy), I don't really mind logging once when I'm on a new computer/phone/whatever, it's the same issue as google / facebook / twitter / ...