TL;DR the study is a 30 hour/week study and in practice the employees work 6 to 6.25h a day. When you speak about the study in laymen terms, you can say 6 hour/workday pilot because that is what it is in practice , however to be scientifically correct it is 30 hours/week pilot.

Full explanation ->

From the report with Google Translate

> Full-time dimensions in the study is 30 hours / week compared to normal working hours at 38.25 hours in the daytime alternatively 37.00 hours (depending on working agreement at the time of appointment) and 36.33 hours for the night.

So the report clearly states 30 hours/week as "heltidsmått" (a measured full-time). Not 6 hours/day.

What about "in practice"? If you look at the first report after 6 months

http://goteborg.vansterpartiet.se/files/2015/10/2015-10-07-6...

Page 6, two tables of example schedules, one to the left before the pilot and the right during the pilot. Remember that a work day includes a free 30 min lunch break so there is a difference between the two columns Period and Timmar (Hours) for 0.5h except the night shift, no free lunch there!

As we can see all day shifts are either 6h or 6.25h during the pilot.

So what about the 5 to 7 hours? I think that is the range what the pilot accepts as "6-hour" workday measurement, i.e you have to have min-max otherwise you could put everything on two days.

Found in the summary after 12 months slide 8

http://we.gu.se/digitalAssets/1574/1574441_2016-04-21-1445-s...

Left column, the Trial 5-7 hours/day as "ram" (frame, within these numbers, budget)

But in practice the schedule ended up as 6 to 6.25h. I guess to try to be true to 6-hour workday ideal.

Note: working hours in Sweden is regulated to 40 hours/week.

https://www.av.se/arbetsmiljoarbete-och-inspektioner/lagar-o...

New note: one of the political parties behind this pilot, the Left party, calls the pilot "six hour working day/30 hours working week". That should keep it covered!

http://nyheter24.se/debatt/767075-pilhem-v-darfor-infor-vi-6...