I think this may be the report [1]? It seems that their P1 did not meet the standards, due to miscommunication -- not language incapability, but they were able to correct it in P2:

> It happened that some modifications and extensions to Reference 1 were agreed to at the experiment kickoff meeting at NSWC. Dr. Jones and Dr. Hudak were not informed of those extensions until after the completion and review of the initial draft of Prototype 1. [...]

> Prototype 2: We believe that our Prototype 2 will be most comparable to the prototypes prepared by the other teams. This prototype satisfies all mandatory requirements of the problem as defined in References 1 and 2, and also incorporates generalizations to support anticipated future requirements. To accomplish this task, the original author of Prototype 1 made a number of modifications and enhancements requiring about five hours [...]

P1 and P3 solutions are attached in appendices, along with some others.

[1] http://www.cs.yale.edu/publications/techreports/tr1031.pdf