The aggregated benchmark numbers are total bullshit, a complete rip off & insultingly anti-useful. This is serious propaganda, total malarkey. Who knows which of those games can use how many cores? Who knows how the results from various games get aggregated together to produce the "98%" result. I struggle to think of a less informative way to leak results.

The only game in the aggregated results that I strongly recognize as being built for multi-core- what Ryzen is really firing shots across the bow at Intel at- is BF4. And I'm not sure how scale-out it goes- 4 cores, 6 cores? I have no idea how these other games scale- Far Cry 4, GRID, AutoSport, X3:TC, Witcher 3, Anno 2070. I'm pretty confident at least two of them don't scale well across cores at all. It may not be how games are built now, but in the future, we need to have the expectation that good games scale out, and part of the problem with setting this expectation has been the huge premium Intel charges- the exotic status it sets- for many-core parts, and AMD seems set to put a huge amount of performance on the table for very little cash, if game makers are willing to keep up.