Ireland. Even if we lose most of the water through rusty pipes, there's still no shortage. Ireland uses that water to be the fifth largest beef exporter in the world and the largest exporter of beef in Europe.

Human settlements have always been preferentially situated on rivers and other natural freshwater sources. So yes, many places are fine.

Singapore does pretty well, considering their 'traditional' main water supply is situated in another country (Malaysia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in...

They currently have the capacity to satisfy 30% of water demand using 'reclaimed water' (i.e. recycled) and 10% using desalinated. Although I don't think they actually need to fully utilise these capacities as 50-75 per cent of their water needs are met by man-made rainfall catchments.

Iceland, Guyana and Suriname seem to be doing alright [0].

According to the United Nations yearly availability of less than 1.700 cubic meters of water per year per capita is the lower limit [1].

[0]: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ER.H2O.INTR.PC?year_high...

[1]: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/...

Oregonian here. Looks like we have above average snowpack currently:

http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/data/water/wcs/gis/maps/...

Most of the USA East Cost, and the Gulf of Mexico for that matter, do fine. In Alabama it almost rains too much for agriculture.

Siberia maybe? Plenty rivers, no much use for water.

Now, contamination is another question I presume.