if they are using html5 features and degrading gracefully, as most html5 does by default anyway, why not say you are using html5?
for one it might help push a few people into using more html5 capable browsers.
for one it might help push a few people into using more html5 capable browsers.
From the article:
"Friedman estimates that 97 percent of browsers will be able to read Scribd’s HTML5 documents because those parts of the standard are older and more widely adopted."
I don't read that as 'graceful degradation', but as a subset based on older tech.
However, the documents will basically look the same across all of our supported browsers.