If this doesn't rely on HTML5 features, why call it HTML5?
DHTML or javascript would have been good enough then, wouldn't it?
DHTML or javascript would have been good enough then, wouldn't it?
for one it might help push a few people into using more html5 capable browsers.
From the article:
"Friedman estimates that 97 percent of browsers will be able to read Scribd’s HTML5 documents because those parts of the standard are older and more widely adopted."
I don't read that as 'graceful degradation', but as a subset based on older tech.
However, the documents will basically look the same across all of our supported browsers.