Ministry of Truth?
Answer the question:
Is it bad to "suppress speech" that is a threat to "free speech" itself?
Take freedom of speech, social justice, progress,... as an universal and it's ultimately destructive (to believers and itself).
Speech is only speech. It cannot do anything by itself. The only way speech can affect the world is by urging people to do things that they would not have done otherwise.
Spaces before punctuation?
> Who decides what is fake or what isn't ?
Courts.
> This is what despotism looks like.
No, despotism is what despotism looks like.
> It looks like good intentions at first then gets abused[...]
That's just the slippery slope fallacy. It doesn't work as an argument because it's too broad. I. e. "now they're outlawing shooting at people, next thing you know, you can't even shoot the breeze anymore"
Courts deciding whether or not you're allowed to say something is only marginally better than other government officials deciding whether or not you're allowed to say something.
Slippery slope is only a fallacy in the strict Boolean sense. It's a perfectly useful heuristic in Bayesian reasoning. In particular, it speaks to the effects of shifting the Overton Window.
One man's art is another man's porn, one man's truth is another man's propaganda.