Same when saying "Hoare logic".
It's unfortunate people think of Coq as an academic language. I really think it's something more people should pull out at the workspace and not confine it to college experimentation.
However the academic side of it is pretty slick. First, it's amazing how a few dozen lines of Coq can help explain the ins-and-outs of Hoare logic. (https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/sf/current/HoareAsLogic....). If you're into some really heady stuff and into homotopic types, the HoTT/Coq community has been explosive lately. While it's a great community, they can be a little particular when it comes to pull requests. Don't take it personally,
Writing secure software will become a huge priority over the next few decades. There are many tools out there to create verifiable software, but I suspect there will always an opening for someone who can crank out rock solid Coq.
EDIT: Inria is French (although Google translate insists the less fortunate homophone still exists in French).
In french, the word (fr)"bite" translates to "cock". It's pronounced like (en)"bit". And while a lot of people prefer "octet", "bit" has very much become part of the french vocabulary. So, what do we do?
We don't care. We giggle at it when we're in high school and then it stops being funny. In Swedish, (en)"sex" and (en)"six" are the same word (se)"sex", pronounced the same way. They don't care.
I also feel like some people here might be forgetting that (en)"cock" has other meanings in English, including the male bird which is what (fr)"coq" means
Edit: Prefixed everything because this post was far too confusing.
Minor remarque changing nothing in the meaning of your message.
PS: remark, not remarque ;)
Which (en)"cock" does (fr)"bite" translate to?
Try playing with https://translate.google.com - the audio is very fair on it (albeit spoken much slower than you normally would).
Maybe Certified Programming with Dependent Types is along the lines of what you are looking for?