Hacker News Reader

Comment by Vekz | Hacker News Reader

Its true and unfortunate. Typescript is the new Coffeescript. It splits the ecosystem. Flow is a progressive enhancement and improves the ecosystem. Typescript has had more push in the mindshare marketing from Microsoft.

View on HN

TypeScript doesn't split the community any more than Flow does. TypeScript remains very close to ES2016/2017, syntax-wise, with the only major difference being type annotations, but you have those with flow as well. Anybody who can read JavaScript can read TypeScript.

Flow tries to integrate with the existing ecosystem as much as possible. By taking advantage of Babel, ESLint, Atom, etc.

With Flow you don't even have to opt-in to a new syntax. You can just use comments:

    function foo(val /* : boolean */) /* : string */ {}

Using really powerful inference you can also write much fewer types. If you have well types libraries [you sometimes don't need types in your code at all](https://medium.com/@thejameskyle/flow-mapping-an-object-373d...).

> With Flow you don't even have to opt-in to a new syntax. You can just use comments:

So you use a opt-in comment-based syntax instead of a opt-in non-comment based one for type-annotations.

Hardly a big difference.

> Using really powerful inference you can also write much fewer types

I'm just going to assume you didn't know typescript does this too.

Typescript is nice. You should give it a try once. You may end up surprised:)

Comments don't change it from being valid javascript whatsoever.

> By taking advantage of Babel, ESLint, Atom, etc.

Doesn't TypeScript actually predate all of those tools? So that logic doesn't seem reasonable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com