I can't imagine FitBit wanting to continue to keep a competitor that would let third parties de-value the premium features with an open SDK.
I can't imagine FitBit wanting to continue to keep a competitor that would let third parties de-value the premium features with an open SDK.
Once you get past hardware, almost all of our software feature decisions come down to battery life. The cheaper bands are smaller, and have smaller batteries, and compromising on battery life wouldn't serve our customers very well.
As evinced by myself and many people in this thread alone, you'd better buy yourself some Gorilla Glue if you're buying a Charge HR, because the band is useless, to the point of being "not fit for purpose". Not that FitBit will accept a return, of course...
"We can give you 25% off a new FitBit!" hahaha. No. I'll lament my purchase, apply more glue to keep the band even slightly attached, until it finally gives up the ghost, and then I'll never buy another FitBit product again.
What are the circumstances for yours? Maybe with the Charge 2 out they're offering you 25% off that?