Hacker News Reader

Comment by phereford | Hacker News Reader

Absolutely! We use rails. I just mentioned doing it in that method as opposed to throwing it in a migration. That migration shouldn't change in version control. We wanted a history of the changes and an easy way to access it in migrations.

Sorry for not explaining that fully.

View on HN

Makes sense.

I suppose you could also execute "REPLACE FUNCTION" and redefine the inside a new migration each time you want to change it. The downside is that you end up with the whole function in new a migration every time you want to change if. But if you're not updating your stored procedures very frequently (which is usually the case, IME), it probably wouldn't be too bad.

At work we use a rather idiosyncratic tool called RoundhousE to deploy our SQL. It treats sql labelled as a stored procedure differently, and will run the file on every deploy, as opposed to scripts that alter the schema, which are only ran once, and may not be modified.

The system works pretty well.

You don't need a tool for this. If you store base data in one schema, and functions/views in another, you can update this second schema willy nilly without worrying about damaging your data.

Just start the second file with DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS schemaname CASCADE; CREATE SCHEMA schemaname;. Then, make sure any functions/views/permissions built on top of this schema are also contained within this file.

Or you can just pull the SQL for the stored procedure from a table column and execute it dynamically.

Now it's an ops problem :-)

Haha, usually we hear this from smart guys who have been working for about 8 months...

Oh, that's slick. Nice!

Or you can just define the function every time you use it. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-do.html

That won't help if you want to use it for indexing, as the article demonstrated.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com