Times are changing...
It's told in the first chapter of the famous childrens book, "the little prince"
> The narrator explains that, as a young boy, he once drew a picture of a boa constrictor digesting an elephant in its stomach; however, every adult who saw the picture would mistakenly interpret it as a drawing of a hat. Whenever the narrator would try to correct this confusion, he was ultimately advised to set aside drawing and take up a more practical or mature hobby. The narrator laments the crass materialism of contemporary society and the lack of creative understanding displayed by adults. As noted by the narrator, he could have had a great career as a painter, but this opportunity was crushed by the misunderstanding of the adults.
[1] http://www.communia-association.org/2015/01/23/the-little-pr...
Ignoring the cultural reference everyone here is talking about:
How do you get that perception? We apply the adjective adult to animals to whom we (rightfully or wrongfully) don't attribute intelligence, and even to other lifeforms which we usually categorize as non-sentient (e.g. adult trees).
I think it is perfectly legitimate to assign the adjective adult to a neural network that has either left the training phase, or that is only undergoing marginal changes in further training. This seems to be mostly in line with how the word adult is used in other contexts.
Not that I'm opposed to calling software intelligent, in fact I think it would be weird if we couldn't call something intelligent just because it's silicon-based instead of being based on organic neurons. I just find it odd that you associate "adult" with intelligence at all.
So in this sense, I found it surprising to associate a word that I use for "living"/biological things to a digital thing; specially in the context of A.I.
Maybe the term adult is, for me at least, very loaded with lots of meanings that go far behind the simple notion of "maturity"
Love Le Petite Prince! Read it both in French and English.