"Also, unlike what some commenters think, this doesn't really go against democracy. "
It definitely goes against democracy and civility.
Maybe it's for the better, maybe it's for the worse - but a small group of people taking it upon themselves to decide for everyone else how a city should operate is a very tricky place for any society to be.
Maybe most people don't want something.
Maybe it makes rescue workers jobs difficult by blocking traffic in a certain hot spot.
Maybe the situation is more complex than one would imagine (i.e. some lanes radically affect the flow of traffic, screw up incoming/outgoing traffic/lane changes).
I can think of quite a few things that 'civic vigilantes' could do that would be way, way out of bounds.
It would be nice if SF could elect a mayor that could improve efficiency as opposed to simply encouraging people to make up their own policies.