Contrarian views are one thing. Addressing the people who fund your company like a belligerent troll is another.
You're entitled to free speech, you're not entitled to a captive ear to hear it.
Contrarian views are one thing. Addressing the people who fund your company like a belligerent troll is another.
You're entitled to free speech, you're not entitled to a captive ear to hear it.
Looks to me like free speech is still free and trolling at work still has consequences and there's not much to see here unless you're personally involved with one of the companies.
I've excluded people for less, but then I haven't as YC asked sometimes awkward people to be stressed out for a long period of time while saying that diversity of opinion is valued.
To be fair, I think companies and individuals should have a right to disassociate with anyone for any reason they choose (yes including the bad reasons). But they should at least be honest about it, rather than hiding behind some veil of "it's abusive behaviour". Just admit you don't like the opinion before it cross that line, and purge appropriately.
Sure, in the sense of the "liberals and safe spaces" macro topic, I'll concede that.
But YC is big on bringing in founders from other countries and giving them the tools to be successful in America.
In those scenarios YC is the foundation of their life in the country. Funding, documentation, network, etc. To have voices in the group that's supposed to help you start talking about "build the wall" and deporting people, especially in the context of the larger Trump political movement?
Yeah, if a company paid for me to come to a foreign land and do business, but members started talking about deporting all the guys like me and building a wall to keep them out, I would feel uncertain about my future, my business, and my residency. unsafe.
I think it's completely reasonable in this case.
How would a sane adult feel like they were in some kind of danger by someone wanting stronger controls on immigration?
Ironically a captive ear is exactly what SJW's demand, and if you fail to oblige you're a (delete as appropriate) straight/white/male/able-bodied/cis-gendered/dudebro who is "part of the problem" and "literally Hitler". I'm so disappointed in how partisan YC has become, capitulating completely to prevailing meme of SJWs. It's becoming less about "make something people want" and more "care about what people think".
This had little to do with politics. The guy mocked a YC founder who expressed fear for his safety, and called another YC founder a "coward", among other things.
And just a couple weeks ago YC didn't capitulate to demands to cut ties with Peter Thiel over his support of Trump.
What other instances are you referring to?
When you're a dissident or ideological minority in any context, it's absolutely essential at all times to be the kindest, gentlest, sweetest person in the room. That way, when they ban you for "feeling unsafe," it's obvious to everyone what's going on.
Obviously OP wasn't actually a danger to anyone. That's ridiculous. But there isn't any world where you can be a dissident and also be a dick, and get away with it.