What could possibly go wrong, really.
Informative and concise.
Thought it was extremely hard to do though...
I also don't like how the rest of the video continues to try to put nuclear in a bad light, going as far as implying it's not "clean energy".
You can not claim that without a credible plan to store it until it's no longer hot, however long that takes.
Well, it's not. Whether it's "cleaner" than alternative fossil fuels is an interesting debate, however.
You don't get very far in life relying on best-case scenario planning.
It's interesting that it may be cleaner than traditional fossil fuels, but suggesting nuclear waste does not pose any environmental risk because it can be safely stored is exactly as you say: it's like saying anything does not pose risk because it can be safely averted. I could use the same logic to argue cars do not pose any safety risk because we can safely avert accidents. It's just wishful thinking to say we are capable to not make mistakes, and it's not logical to say there is no risk when there is.