Comment by daveguy | Hacker News Reader

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by daveguy | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Technically deep learning started before 2008. Here is a trends paper from back then:

http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~fritz/absps/tics.pdf

Here is a google tech talk from 2007:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyzOUbkUf3M

Companies didn't pick it up until more recently. GPU-ification happened in 2009 with Ng's group:

http://robotics.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/icml09-LargeScaleUn...

And yes, Krizhevsky et al (Hinton's lab) applied GPU deep learning to ImageNet in 2010:

https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-wi...

Those are great links! But the 2008 Hinton paper would not be considered deep learning, it is classic neural nets. It makes no mention of CNNs or GPUs, which is what really got this all going back in 2012 with ImageNet / Krizhevsky.

The ImageNet paper is from 2012, not 2010. That's when the computer vision community really went "wow". IIRC, almost every entry in ImageNet 2013 was using CNNs.

> it is classic neural nets. It makes no mention of CNNs or GPUs

Is using a GPU "essential" for something to be deep learning? I'd always thought that the important part was some sort of hierarchical representation learning.

GPUs certainly help, in that you don't want to wait all day while your code does that, but they're not necessary.

I think Tsvi Achler's video here will be useful to understand better what the article is about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gTJorBeLi8

Good call on the 2012 not 2010 date. I missed that. GPU are not requirements of deep nn. Hinton's pseudo-bayesian + ReLU approach was the last piece of the deep neural net functionality. CNNs dated back to 1995-1998 with LeCun and Bengio. Although GPUs do accelerate deep NNs enough to be feasible on image data (thanks to Ng).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com