oh my, once you discover the concept of TCO your mind will be blown.
see the recent IBM study on this very topic (macs vs pcs).
and yes, that's IBM as in IBM-compatible PC.
see the recent IBM study on this very topic (macs vs pcs).
and yes, that's IBM as in IBM-compatible PC.
Haha I love when users attempt to act condescending, but actually demonstrate their own reading comprehension failure.
TCO --- you mean TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP, a concept I discussed at length in the post you're replying to?
Wow, imagine that. I'd love to discover a topic for the first time that I already discussed at length with over 4 different total cost comparisons, including repairs and upgrades.
EDIT: IF we want to do TCO, mind you, I notice pro-apple folks don't include the $100-$200 of mandatory spider-web adapters you have to buy, as well. TCO is complicated and it's easy for Apple fans to hide the significantly overpriced Apple accessory costs from it :)
If you value your time at zero, then yes, Windows on cheapo devices is your thing. Oh look, another Win10 upgrade, so good.
Value your time at zero, lmao, condescending affluence at its best.
If you are the 1%, you value your time at a what 1/10000 level of humanity?
There is no shame to admitting you have money and will spend it like this.
But for the rest of people -- the 9999/10000, a few minutes of learning and adaption isn't a waste of time, it's a material gain in skills and money.
Rationalize away ~
Case in point, my landlords have an old AMD64 (single core, 2.4 GHz, I think) system with 1 gig of RAM, running Vista. For the past five years, they've called me at least four times per year to come out to their house and clean up browser extensions and unwanted software that piggybacked on other program's installers. I don't charge them since I consider it a favor, but each time they pay me at least $50.
So that cheapo computer cost them $1000 over the past five years. They could've spent less than that, up front, and got a middle of the road refurbished Mac and likely would've never (or rarely) had to call me at all. I've suggested this or a flavor of Linux too, but they're afraid of change. Instead, they recently bought a little Dell netbook running Windows 10 for $270, and I expect the calls will keep coming.
You don't need a $1200 laptop to browse the internet safely.
This is a part of the "price blindness" of pro Apple users who are unwilling to consider the sub $1000 market, and seek to rationalize the value of what is fairly the worlds most expensive mass produced luxury laptop.
Wanting a Mac is fine, but pretending it's a cost-conscious decision that returns great value for the average internet browser is pretty ridiculous IMO.
What does a $1200 macbook do that a $500 iPad can't for the average user?
>I've suggested this or a flavor of Linux too, but they're afraid of change.
But go ahead and continue making assumptions about how "price blind" I am. I'm far from an Apple fanboy, but Apple is a brand that most people recognize, and yet usually stays free from the issues that Windows has among the less technologically inclined (which includes my 60-something year old landlords).
so we're against any notebooks now, as a typical user only ever needs a tablet? great, you've confirmed Apple's strategy across PCs and iPads (incl. the iPad Pro).
they're abandoning the Air and cheaper lines for that very reason - the iPads and iPhones are good enough now.
MPBs are now a testing ground for new inputs (Touchbar) and port unification. Eventually they all add a full touchscreen keyboard, once it can do haptic response (see the iPhone7 home button for a preview). first the Touchbar will become haptic, so we're at least 2 iterations away from it.
Actually more likely that this thing then ends up in the iPad product line, fully destroying the classic PC line. but who knows.
with apple you get a genius bar at least.