The entirety of his comment was summarizing the piece (To quote it: this is a..., The piece does not say...., It doubly says that if we..., This piece is a defense of...). and he didn't add any maligning.
>The danger here is that were the government to effectively coop wikileaks itself, which you think is anti-government, it would become a brutal and effective trojan horse.
The malignment is that "the government" would somehow use wikileaks to some negative ends [sneak into our minds?!].
>The entirety of his comment
You'll note that the original article doesn't even contain the word "trojan", and only mentions Wikileaks twice -- never in the context of it being co-opt'd by a government.