Look. Just about anyone can create some "database" and declare it "rock-solid". Frankly, a simple key-value store is built in most languages.
Do you have more than that? Do you have benchmarks? You know, competing against the other providers?
Look. Just about anyone can create some "database" and declare it "rock-solid". Frankly, a simple key-value store is built in most languages.
Do you have more than that? Do you have benchmarks? You know, competing against the other providers?
I think the argument in favor of it being more reliable is an easier one, however, as Bedrock is specifically designed (and used, at scale, for 8 years) to provide highly available redundancy in the form of WAN-replication and automatic failover.
Regardless, I think you'll agree that "rock-solid" is not a precise technical term, and I hope you'll allow a bit of play on words. Whether or not it's literally as solid as a rock is unclear, but it is definitely very reliable -- and more reliable than most.