I know a guy who correctly predicted the Obama/Romney popular vote outcome within 1% of each's actual take IIRC. As of now, he's got Clinton at 47% and Trump 34%, based on nothing more than personal outlook, hunches, and mulling over various polling data (he had 47% Clinton to 41% Trump just before the Conventions). Point being it might be just as likely an irrational human can point out human behavior (en masse, e.g. voting) on par with a statistical model, given some particular circumstances.