Every industry has their own version of the perfect employee but in tech, companies actually expect to get them.
In such situation, wouldn't using standard tools would benefit companies, but also benefit employees. And from the tecchnical point of view, this seems achievable , because many companies do similar stuff.
But instead we get the currrent situation(one example is javascript frameworks). Why ?
Each time you use or refuse to use a particular Javascript framework you make a democratic vote on the situation. So the existence of lots of JS framework is a result of a democratic election.
"Whatever you need, whatever you want, the perfect answer is out there, somewhere, and you can communicate instantly. You just need to know where to look. All the mountains are flat."
This might even be true - but it does not say for which cost/salary it is available. :-)
I'd love to know how many of them were getting 1st round interviews, how many were getting followups, how many were getting job offers.
If they're falling out at the first round and not getting invited back, that would shift some of the blame their way.
That's a very bold claim. I (and I'm sure many other people) have been looking for decades.
I mean, yes the worlds most pre-eminent software developer culture demands high prices.
What about the 98% (fake statistic) of American software developers who do not live in or around San Francisco ...?
I guess we can thank Steve Jobs for that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...
But as far as I heard the accommodation costs are also strongly increasing - from which I would conclude that the actual wages do not increase so much.