Having seen that the $99 price point was too high, is one of your goals still "supercomputing for everyone"? Or has that dream been dashed?
No reason to drive a 1024 core chip to the broad market when most applications aren't ready to use 16 cores. With this chip we focus on customers and aprtners who have proven that they have mastered the 16-core platform.
Yet magically they have no problem taking advantage of massively parallel GPUs...
Most applications don't use 16 CPU cores because they don't need them.