But the organization already can monitor its own traffic. At the source, before it is encrypted.
As for circumvention: are you concerned about ensuring a complete communication paper trail or protection from insider threats?
In this case, the endpoint by necessity is physically accessible to the possible adversary, which means they have a whole host of methods for disabling monitoring software. It's much harder to interfere with a box which you don't have physical access to that is listening in on your communication, and which simply drops any data it cannot intercept.