> "Systemd is defective by design."
The most succinct explanation of Systemd possible.
The most succinct explanation of Systemd possible.
having read this post I'd say a slightly less succinct but infinitely more informative version would be
> "Systemd is defective by design because they totally disregard the fail-safe by design rules"
So either the kerbel devs did take over udev development...
BTW GKH was oddly absent in that thread, and the kernel devs ire was aimed at Sievers...
But in a fight between GKH and T'so, I'll take T'so. /dev/random's ...interesting design aside, I frankly trust T'so far more than I trust GKH, who backs LP, a person I emphatically do not trust, in a lot of things.