But I just don't see it - machine/statistical/deep learning gigs just seem really rare.
I know this isn't a great metric, but searches on Indeed.com:
"deep learning" - 873
"machine learning" - 9,762
"statistical learning" - 65
java - 72,802
javascript - 43,785
Same searches on LinkedIn: "deep learning" - 646
"machine learning" - 6,952
"statistical learning" - 34
java - 43,845
javascript - 30,818
Even the "machine learning" search on Indeed, with 9K+ results has 1300+ from Amazon, followed by a much smaller number (in low hundreds each) from Microsoft, Google, others (including some that look like staffing companies).Even on HN's who's hiring Sept 2016 thread phrase counts: 14 "deep learning" 79 "machine learning"
I completely agree with the idea that being able to use some deep/machine/statistical learning is going to be a toolset that data hackers need to have. I even think that there is a bit of the "build it and they will come" magic waiting out there.
But I think the best way forward is to be working in data and figure out how to generate value with deep learning - this will be much more productive than trying to seek out a deep learning gig in terms of promoting deep learning in the workplace. Heck, that's a suggestion I would be wise to take myself . . .