It might (and maybe should) be, but maybe not (despite some glimpses of PUA language in there). The really sad part is: This thing has more upvotes than downvotes! That seems to indicate that this POV is somewhat accepted/shared by the given community. And while it is stupid, ugly and nauseating, it's not surprising. Or do we still think it's only men who can be disgusting fucktards? Also, equating physical beauty and even young age with genetic superiority? They don't come much stupider, do they? LAWL!

Doesn't have to be mentally disturbed. Just a horrible person. No matter the truth or falsity of the content, I can think of one scenario when that kind of writing is acceptable: when writing solely for someone who has declared [Crocker's rules][1] on the subject.

[1]: http://sl4.org/crocker.html