So, I dont know what to say about the fact that John SR doesnt have a page about him online as he was head of ALCOA in ~1985...
not my job to prove shit to the internet.... if you dont like my quote - then move on and dont attack me for it.
So, I dont know what to say about the fact that John SR doesnt have a page about him online as he was head of ALCOA in ~1985...
not my job to prove shit to the internet.... if you dont like my quote - then move on and dont attack me for it.
But when you do things like this: "FFS; I am relaying a quote I heard from the head of fucking ALCOA! y'all motherfuckers know what ALCOA is? and how far their reach is...."
That detail mattered because you made it matter. No one attacked you for that.
George may be correct - I'll have to ask my dad now.
While people have posted the listed CEOs of ALCOA in the 80s - I know that for certain he was head of ALCOA. My dad built his freaking house and I worked on it with John Haymaker (who my dad was required to employ during the build of his house on the Truckee River in Tahoe so his kid (the one who is now an architect) could get some build experience)...
But I stand by my comment... those statements were made.
Here it is:
"Mr. Haymaker was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation from January 1994 through December 1999, and was Non-Executive Chairman of that company from October 2001 until July 2006. Prior to joining Kaiser, he served in executive positions for Alcoa Inc., and Alumax Inc."
Alcoa CEO's during the 1980s [1]
W.H. Krome George 1975 - 1983
Charlie Parry 1983 - 1987
Paul O’Neill 1987 - 1999
His profile at Genstar Capital includes what seems like a recent photo [1].
Is that who you're thinking of?
[0] http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?p...
I dont give a shit - but jesus, one quotes another from memory and shitstorm ensues... :)
Whatever.
It's okay to relate anecdotal experience - some these type of comments are really good - but the style in the comment should then reflect the fact that the claim cannot be validated in any concrete way.
I proved who I was talking about, I stand by my statement and I believe that some HNers are dicks, period.
No, you did not 'prove' with any value of proof anyone else here would recognize. None of us can know did that conversation happen, if it did, were they serious or joking,etc etc. There is no way any sensible person could integrate this into their theory of the world.
Basically, unless you can provide evidence that is well known/scientifically rigorous/would hold in the court of law, what you wrote, is hearsay.
You can stand by your statement - no one is claiming you to be a liar. But claiming fluoridation of water is just some nefarious big-corp scheme is, to put it mildy, extraordinary. Given the prevalence of anti-vaxxers and other crazies in the mainstream outlets I can only imagine the toleration level for unscientific gossip on public health matters is really low.
Calm down dude, no need to get personal on people.