On top of that, it can be true that industry funds research that is potentially biased to a certain conclusion where the conclusion is actually true.
There is also a positive bias from industry studies due to the fact that products tested internally that don't work will not be pursued and therefore that research is not published.
The OP's article suggests this method has lead to uncomfortable bises in the past.
Doesn't look like one-sided research, just missing evidence. So unless you can come up with clear evidence that this radiation is harmful, I'll guess we have to live with
"to date, no adverse health effects have been established
as being caused by mobile phone use"
I'm just pointing out that it's a logical mistake to assume it is harmful just because some of the research was sponsored by industry.