I love using my DSLR, but I hate dealing with the workflow. If I take a picture with my DSLR I have to put the SD card in my computer, load up Lightroom, edit, export, and finally upload/share the picture.
I love using my DSLR, but I hate dealing with the workflow. If I take a picture with my DSLR I have to put the SD card in my computer, load up Lightroom, edit, export, and finally upload/share the picture.
Edit: Also, you definitely don't need to fire up Lightroom to share photos from your DSLR; I think practically any DSLR can shoot JPG. Many DSLRs can also share photos to phones via wifi or Bluetooth these days. Mine didn't come with such a feature, but Nikon sells a $20-30 adapter that adds that capability.
It actually works surprisingly well, but I've not traded in my SLR. Being able to do something similar with a second lens -- or even using Project Tango sensors -- to avoid the post-exposure motion would make it more useful, but I suspect still not as versatile (and even with my SLR, the difference between my relatively cheap lenses and borrowing someone's more expensive lenses, on the same body, is quite obvious).
This means objects and figures that aren't faces might not be tuned too well.
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Wireless-Mobile-Adapter-Digital...
Many of the reviews say it is not very good, but I have not tried it personally.
Then there is Geo tagging.
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-GP-1A-Unit-Cameras-27034/dp/B00...
Again, reviews are pretty poor.
Like I said, I love my DSLR, but the phone workflow is just so much easier/nicer.
With a phone, you just tap the share button on the picture you just took, tap the icon for whatever you want to share it to and you're done.
I surely don't and do exactly the same workflow with my phones as I do with my cameras.
Other priorities might be ok to have their pictures known to the world.
I am moving all my photos from the last few decades into Photos/iCloud which will then appear on my phone.
It's a competitor for high end P&S e.g. Sony RX100 and mirrorless e.g. Fuji X100.
And I think that's true even if you're a professional - as a professional, your shots should use your phone's cellular connection to upload the shots to Adobe Creative Cloud (or competing cloud) as you take them, so that when you open your machine to do post-processing work, your shots are all already there. Why should anybody be bothering with CF or SD cards anymore? Just store everything on your smartphone (did you hear the iPhone 7 will now have a 256 GB option?), which in and of itself is a buffer for your work before it gets transferred to the cloud.
Modular backs a la Moto Z are interesting because there's a lot of potential now for making "big glass" relevant again for prosumers. Make a modular back with a large sensor and a Micro Four-Thirds or F mount. The only real problem is getting OEMs to agree on a common standard that they would stick to for years, because nobody wants to spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars on a camera back they won't be able to use next year when they upgrade their phone, and yes that's actually a really big problem, but leadership from Google (in the Nexus/Pixel lines) can really help here.
I hear very good things about Sony's A6000 series and some Micro 4/3 cameras.
Transfer it to your phone and do whatever you would have done otherwise.
Or at least just move those files to my desktop only. But what I see is that Canon doesn't allow that (copy all files in the background to e.g. an ftp server), it has to have a phone or some strange proprietary Canon app.
For me it beats the purpose of having a wifi in a DSLR, I might as well just use SD card it the photos are not moved automatically where I would like.
Random Google Search: of Techradar's top 10 list of full-frame DSLRs, 7 have Wi-Fi.
http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/came...