As in, I'm not going to factor my child's value into my assets since I'm not going to sell it. Or in the OP's case, since his car will never be sold, it's not relevant how much value he's losing by keeping it for x years. Not that the car's value doesn't depreciate, just that the value of the car isn't ever important after the initial cost.
Yes, it matters. There are a lot of intangible assets that are not sold (such as Goodwill), even those can be given quantifiable value
I guess maybe you're being pedantic and saying everything's value is always important to make measured decisions, but that seems lame in this discussion so I assume I'm glossing over some fundamental fact.
Otherwise any sort of calculation of expenses is missing one of the biggest components, the cost of the car.
They include the cost of the car as the first calculation...
> Total Cost of Ownership:
>> Cost of Tesla: $79,000 used with 35,000 miles
Is that not enough? Do you need to calculate the potential earnings every day that you decide not to sell the car over it's lifetime?
Also, perhaps this is tangential, but the author was calculating how much they had lost or saved over the course of ownership up to that point. I feel like the OP in this subthread didn't actually read the article and just commented after skimming over the cost breakdown thinking it was supposed to be something it wasn't (i.e., a cost/benefit analysis for the car's lifetime).